send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which of the following sections of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 states that the admissions can operate as estoppels?
Section 28
Section 30
Section 31
Section 34
Let’s break it down, section by section:
- Section 28: This deals with the relevancy of admissions in criminal cases, especially connected to confessions in police custody. It’s not about estoppel.
- Section 30: This is about the consideration of confessions by co-accused. Again, nothing here about admissions acting as estoppel.
- Section 31: Here’s the key. Section 31 states that admissions are not conclusive proof but they may operate as estoppels. This connects admissions and estoppel directly.
- Section 34: This covers entries in books of account as evidence—it’s about documentary evidence, not admissions or estoppel.
So, the correct answer is Option 3: Section 31.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses