Which of the following admission is no evidence ........

Indian Evidence Act (IEA) 1872 Admission and Rejection of Evidence

Download Solution PDF

Which of the following admission is no evidence:

an admission by one of the several defendants in a suit against another defendant

an admission by a guardian ad litem against a minor

an admission by one of the partners of a firm against the firm or other partners

only (a) & (b).

Explanation:

- Option 1: An admission by one of several defendants against another defendant typically holds no weight. It doesn't bind another defendant because admissions are personal in nature.

- Option 2: An admission by a guardian ad litem against a minor is generally not accepted as evidence against the minor. The guardian represents the minor’s interests, and their admissions shouldn’t harm the minor’s legal position.

- Option 3: An admission by one partner can bind the firm and other partners if it's made in the course of the firm's business. This holds evidential value.

- Option 4: This option suggests that only statements (a) and (b) are correct as having no evidential value.

- ?? Correct Answer: Option 4 - only (a) & (b).