send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which of the following statements do NOT hold true for admissibility of the evidence?
A party filing a document cannot urge its inadmissibility when the opposite party seeks to use it against him
The fact that a document was procured by improper of illegal means will not be a bar to its admissibility if it is relevant and its genuineness proved
The faculties of a sniffer dog may be taken as evidence for the purpose of establishing the guilt of an accused
If the evidence is irrelevant, consent of the parties cannot make it relevant
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses