send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
B sues to recover one-fourth of the price of the house alleged to have been sold by the A to C. The proper registered sale deed is available. The claim is based on local custom. The transaction between A and C was ostensibly not a sale but a usufructuary mortgage. B wants to give oral evidence in support of this. Which of the following statements will be true for the case?
A. B is not a party to the transaction between A and C as such he is entitled to give evidence
The evidence by B will be hit by section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and as such will not be admissible
The B is not a party to the transaction between A and C, as such he cannot give oral evidence
A and C have committed a fraud, as such the evidence of B is admissible as long as it is supported by written proof
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses