send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
A letter purporting to be issued from the Chief Secretary to the Government of Bengal was signed by a deputy secretary not in his official capacity, but for the Chief Secretary. The Court –
Can draw a presumption under section 79 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 that the document is an authorised document
Can draw a presumption under section 81 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 that the document is an authorised document
Can draw a presumption under section 83 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 that the document is an authorised document
Cannot draw a presumption under the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 that the document is an authorised document
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses