send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
A prosecution witness, by viewing a NDTV’s news film, identified the accused as a member of a group of persons who had caused serious public disturbance. The original film was retained by NDTV and at trial the prosecution relied on the video cassette, which the Court was satisfied was an authentic copy of the original film. The evidence-
Is admissible, as the rules for submitting primary documents cannot be extended to films
Is not admissible as the original is in existence, the secondary document cannot be used
Is not admissible as the Court is competent to order NDTV to submit the original film
Is admissible as the Original document is a public document
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses