send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Statement made under Section 27, though not admissible under it may be admissible under which of the following section of the Indian Evidence Act?
Section 7
Section 8
Section 9
all of them
- Section 7: This section deals with facts that form part of the same transaction, are the cause or effect of facts in issue, or provide occasion, cause, or effect. Information from a statement could relate to this.
- Section 8: Covers motive, preparation, and conduct, whether previous or subsequent. Statements could be relevant to show the conduct of the accused or other related parties.
- Section 9: Pertains to facts necessary to explain or introduce relevant facts, or to establish the identity of anything or person, time, place, etc. A statement might give context or clarification to a relevant fact.
- All of them: Statements inadmissible under Section 27 could be considered under Sections 7, 8, or 9 based on relevance to the circumstances of the case as outlined above.
Correct Answer: Option 4 - All of them
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses