Explanation:

- Option 1: A is not guilty

- The act was done in good faith to prevent further harm, which is often a valid defense, especially in emergencies.

- Aimed at saving lives or property, which may justify the act legally.

- Option 2: A is guilty

- Would apply if the action was malicious or without any reasonable basis.

- Not relevant here as there was good intent.

- Option 3: The action was intentional

- The act was deliberate, but intention here is linked to motivation.

- Does not imply guilt since the intent was good.

- Option 4: Both (A) and (C)

- Combines non-guilt with acknowledgment of intention.

- Intention in this context doesn’t equate to guilt.

Correct Answer: Option 1: A is not guilty