Q. Whether High Court Under Article 226 And 227 can Interfere With Orders Passed Under Arbitration Act. If Yes, When And Under What Circumstances ?

RELEVANT CASE LAW:

NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING COMPANY Vs. BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED LL 2021 SC 203

REITERATED THAT

• a High Court while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 and 227 should be extremely circumspect in interfering with orders passed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
• Despite this Court repeatedly referring to Section 5 of the Arbitration Act in particular
• and the Arbitration Act in general
• and despite this Court having laid down in

DEEP INDUSTRIES Ltd.   Vs.  ONGC & ANR. (2020) 15 SCC 706

• That the High Court under Article 226 and 227 should be extremely circumspect in interfering with orders passed under the Arbitration Act,
• Such interference being only in cases of EXCEPTIONAL RARITY or
• Cases which are stated to be patently lacking in INHERENT JURISDICTION,
• Apex court with great pain and anguish OBSERVES THAT High Courts are interfering with deposit orders that have been made.
• This is not a case of exceptional rarity or of any patent lack of inherent jurisdiction.