send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In a firm consisting of A and B, a minor was admitted to the benefits of partnership. The firm had dealings with the C's concern and it became indebted to them. After that, the partnership was dissolved. Subsequently, the minor, attained majority, but he did not exercise an option under Sec. 30 (5).
The minor could be made. liable since by failing to exercise the option within 6 months from the date of his attaining majority, he had become a partner.
The minor could not be made liable, as when he attained majority the firm had already been dissolved.
Sec. 30 presupposes the existence of ,a partnership.
Both (b) and (c).
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses