send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
There must be some positive conduct from which the court can infer that the regular partners intended to admit to the benefit of the partnership a minor. In which of the following cases, such a conduct will be inferred?
The fact that the minor rendered help in the joint family business.
Two partners entered into a partnership. One partner died, the other partner continued the business under the old name and style with the partnership funds. The deceased partner's son (minor) alleged that after his father's death he was admitted to the benefits of partnership.
Both (a) and (b).
None of the above.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses