send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
several persons can be joined as plaintiffs, in cases
where right arises out of the same act in favour of such person
where any common question of law is involved
both (a) and (b)
none of the above
Let’s break this down, here’s what each option is saying:
- Option 1 says people can join as plaintiffs if their rights all come from the same act. That’s true, but it’s not the whole story.
- Option 2 says joining is allowed when there’s a common legal question—so if everyone’s cases hinge on the same rule or issue, they can join too.
- Option 3 covers both: same act and/or common question of law. This is actually what you’ll find in the law (Order 1, Rule 1 CPC in India for example). It lets you join as plaintiffs if either you share a common legal question, or your rights arise out of the same act.
- Option 4, none of the above, is definitely out.
So here’s what this really means: Option 3 is the correct answer.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses