send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which of the following sections of the Specific Relief Act provides a remedy without establishing title?
Section 3
Section 4
Section 5
Section 6
Let’s break down what each section does under the Specific Relief Act:
- Section 3: This section is all about the savings clause. It doesn’t provide any actual remedy—just says the Act doesn’t take away rights already enforceable under other laws.
- Section 4: This makes it clear you can’t get specific relief unless the Act specifically allows for it. No remedies here—just a statement of principle.
- Section 5: This deals with recovery of possession of property, but only if you can prove your title to the property. In other words, you need to show you’re entitled to it before you get relief.
- Section 6: Now here’s the one you’re looking for. Section 6 lets you recover possession of immovable property if you’ve been dispossessed—even if you can’t prove title. You just need to show you had possession and were dispossessed without your consent.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses