Which of the following is true of the effects of admissions ........

Indian Evidence Act (IEA) 1872 Admission and Rejection of Evidence

Which of the following is true of the effects of admissions?

An admission constitutes a substantive piece of evidence in the case and, for that reason, can be relied upon for proving the truth of the facts incorporated therein

An admission has the effect of shifting the onus of proving to the contrary on the party against whom it is produced, with the result that it casts an imperative duty on such party to explain it. In the absence of a satisfactory explanation, it is presumed to true

An admission, in order to be competent and to have the value and effect referred to above should be clear, certain and definite, and not ambiguous, vague to be true

All of them

Explanation:

- Option 1: An admission is indeed a substantial piece of evidence and can be used to prove facts in a case. It can influence the court's view on the matters stated.

- Option 2: Admissions can shift the burden of proof to the opposing party. If no satisfactory explanation is provided, the statements in the admission may be presumed true.

- Option 3: For an admission to hold value, it should be clear and definite. Ambiguous or vague admissions may lack effect in legal settings.

- Option 4: All of the above points combine to offer a comprehensive understanding of how admissions function in a legal context.