send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Oral evidence under section 60 of Evidence Act may be:
direct only
hearsay
both (a) & (b)
either (a) or (b).
- Section 60 of the Evidence Act mandates that oral evidence must be direct.
- Option 1: Direct only
- Relevant provisions require that the person giving oral evidence must have directly seen, heard, or perceived the thing, fact, or event.
- This implies first-hand knowledge, validating it as reliable evidence.
- Option 2: Hearsay
- Hearsay refers to information not originating from the direct witness but ordered through another party.
- Typically inadmissible under this section, hearsay fails to provide direct testimony.
- Option 3: Both (a) & (b)
- Combining direct evidence with hearsay isn’t allowed under this section’s provisions.
- Option 4: Either (a) or (b)
- This option is incorrect since Section 60 does not entertain hearsay.
Answer: Option 1: Direct only
.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses