send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Proviso 1 to Section 33, Indian Evidence Act, not only covers cases of privity in estate and succession of title, but also cases where which of the following condition is met?
the interest of the relevant party in the second proceeding is the subject matter of the first proceeding and is consistent with and not antagonistic to the interest therein of the relevant party to the first proceeding
the interest of both in the answer to be given to the particular question in issue in the first proceeding is identical
either (A) or (B)
both (A) and (B)
- Statement (A): Proviso 1 to Section 33 includes cases where the interest of the relevant party in the second proceeding was the subject matter of the first proceeding and is consistent with, not antagonistic to, the interest of the original party.
- Statement (B): It also applies where the interest of both parties in the answer to the particular question at issue is identical.
- Option 1: Only covers situation (A).
- Option 2: Only covers situation (B).
- Option 3: Suggests the proviso covers cases where either (A) or (B) applies.
- Option 4: Correctly states that it covers cases where both (A) and (B) are met, according to the language in the proviso and case law.
Option 4 is the correct answer.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses