send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Admissible evidence is thus that which is:
relevant
not excluded by any rule of law or practice
either (A) or (B)
both (A) and (B)
- Relevant evidence: This means the evidence should be directly connected and related to the case or facts being adjudicated. If evidence does not meet this standard, it cannot be considered admissible.
- Not excluded by any rule of law or practice: There are legal restrictions and established practices that might disqualify certain evidence, even if it's relevant. For example, hearsay or privileged communication might be excluded by rule.
Option 1: Relevant. This alone might not guarantee admissibility as it could still be excluded by a rule.
Option 2: Not excluded by any rule. Again, it must also be relevant.
Option 3: Either (A) or (B). Both conditions are necessary, not just one.
Option 4: Both (A) and (B). Evidence must be relevant and not excluded by any rule.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses