send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The Supreme Court held in which of the following cases that preamble is not the part of the Constitution of India
Berubari case
A. K. Gopalan case
Balaji Case
Minerva Mill’s case
- The Berubari Union Case (1960) is the correct answer. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Preamble is not a part of the Indian Constitution. Later, this interpretation was revisited, but your answer is about the initial ruling.
- The A. K. Gopalan Case (1950) dealt with the protection of personal liberty and preventive detention, not the status of the Preamble.
- The Balaji Case (1962) focused on reservations in educational institutions and did not involve the Preamble.
- The Minerva Mills Case (1980) is known for discussing the balance of fundamental rights and directive principles but affirmed the Preamble’s significance.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses