send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The idea of Fundamental Rights and Judicial Review is borrowed from:
British form of government
United States
Japanese form of government
Australian form of government
- Fundamental Rights and Judicial Review are considerably influenced by the constitutional framework of the United States.
- The U.S. Constitution emphasizes protecting individual rights and empowering courts to review legislation for constitutional compliance.
- British governance lacks a written constitution specifically detailing fundamental rights; instead, it relies on tradition and statutory law, with no specific provision for judicial review.
- Japan follows its constitution post-World War II, which incorporates the concept of judicial review, but it was influenced largely by U.S. principles.
- Australia has adopted rights and judicial principles, but its model follows more from British traditions.
Option 2: United States
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses