send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Agreement between the parties to institute the suit relating to disputes in a particular court:
does not oust the jurisdiction of other courts
may operate as estoppel between the parties
both (a) & (b)
neither (a) nor (b).
- Option 1: Does not oust the jurisdiction of other courts.
An agreement on a particular court doesn't strip other courts of their authority.
- Option 2: May operate as estoppel between the parties.
If parties agree to litigate only in a chosen court, they might be stopped from saying otherwise later.
- Option 3: Both (a) & (b).
Agreements can both maintain other courts' jurisdiction and work as an estoppel.
- Option 4: Neither (a) nor (b).
This would mean the agreement neither affects other courts' jurisdiction nor acts as estoppel, which doesn't hold true.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses