send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
A sues B for specific performance of an agreement for the sale to him of B’s land, and obtains a decree. In execution of the decree, A is put in possession of a portion only of the land, as it is found that the rest of the land did not belong to B, but to B’s son.
A subsequent suit by A against B for recovery of a portion of the price to the extent of the son’s share is not barred under rule 2, the cause of action being the same
A subsequent suit by A against B for recovery of a por¬tion of the price to the extent of the son’s share is not barred under rule 2, the cause of action being entirely distinct
Either (A) or (B)
None of these
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses