send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The defendant, the editor and proprietor of a newspaper, published articles which referred to the ‘Calcutta Police”, without naming individuals. The plaintiffs, six of the members of the Calcutta Police force, jointly sued the editor for damages, alleging that the articles were directed against them, and that they constituted a libel. Here a libel was in the same words, and in the same documents, but of different persons.
The plaintiffs could not all be joined in one suit
There cannot in such cases be said to be one or the same cause of action
Both (A) and (B)
None of these
- Option 1: The plaintiffs could not all be joined in one suit.
- This suggests each plaintiff's complaint is individual because the article did not specifically name them, making group litigation inappropriate.
- Option 2: There cannot in such cases be said to be one or the same cause of action.
- This implies that since the article does not identify specific plaintiffs, each plaintiff's grievance is separate.
- Option 3: Both (A) and (B).
- Combines both options, stating that each plaintiff should individually prove how the libel personally applies to them and their specific harm.
- Option 4: None of these.
- This would mean neither option 1 nor option 2 applies, which is unlikely here.
Correct Answer: Option 3 - Both (A) and (B).
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses