send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Statement- “In a big relief to liquor companies which are holding their stocks worth more than Rs. 200 crore in Bihar, the Supreme Court on Monday granted them two months more time to transport liquor out of the state and directed them to dispose off their stocks by July 31.”
I. Beverages Companies, contended that it was possible even to destroy the existing stocks by the end of this month.
II. The apex court had earlier fixed a deadline of May 31 for the companies to dispose off their stocks. III. Seeking more time for transporting the stocks out of state, the confederation said in its petition that delay in disposing off stocks was beyond its control as clearances were required from various agencies.
Which of the following can be the Presupposition of the given statement?
Only I
Only II and III
Only I and III
All of the above
None of the above
In the statement we have to pick the statement which can be assumed from above statement. For Statement I. Wrong, Because it was not possible to destroy the existing stocks by the end of this month that is why the companies pleaded to the Supreme Court. For Statement II. Right, Because it is clear from the above statement that the court had fixed the deadline 31 may earlier and there after extended it to 31 july. For Statement III. Right, Because to dispose off stock and transporting it out of the state requires clearance.
By: Munesh Kumari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses