send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
A decree in a suit against certain members of a sect alleged to be wrongdoers in their individual capacity cannot operate as res judicata in a subsequent suit against the other members of the sect. The wrong complained of in the former suit was that the defendants carried an idol in procession through certain streets and that such processions were in violation of plaintiff’s rights.
The suit was against the defendants in their individual capacity, and not as representing the sect to which they belonged
The suit was not as representing the sect to which the defendants belonged
Both (A) and (B)
None of these
- The key issue in the scenario is whether the decree in a previous lawsuit can be used as res judicata against other members of a sect in a new lawsuit.
- Option 1: The suit was against the defendants in their individual capacity, not as representatives of the sect. This means the decree applies only to those individuals.
- Option 2: The suit was not on behalf of the sect, reinforcing that the decree does not impact other sect members.
- Option 3: Both statements (A) and (B) are true. The defendants were sued individually and not as representatives of the sect.
- Option 4: None of these - implies neither statements apply, which isn't correct based on the explanation.
Given these explanations, Option 3 is the correct answer.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses