Six friends P Q R S T and U are standing in a row All of them are facing towards North Who is standi...........

Logical Reasoning(IBPS CL) Data Sufficiency

Direction: Each of the questions below consists of a question and three statements numbered I, II and III. You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements are sufficient to answer the question. Read all the three statements and give answer accordingly

Six friends P, Q, R, S, T and U are standing in a row. All of them are facing towards North. Who is standing between R and T?

Statement I: P is standing second from the left end. R is standing third to the left of Q who is near to T.

Statement II: Q isn’t the immediate neighbor of U who doesn’t sit any extreme ends of the row.

Statement III: T isn’t the immediate neighbor of P.

If the data in statement I and statement II is sufficient to answer the question.

If the data in statement I and statement III is sufficient to answer the question.

If the data in statement II and statement III is sufficient to answer the question.

If the data in all the statements I, II and III together is sufficient to answer the question.

If the data in all the statements I, II and III together isn’t sufficient to answer the question.

छोटे Courses बड़े Results

Master Data Sufficiency

Prepare through Micro-courses

Try Now

Explanation:

From the given information:
Statement I:
P is standing second from the left end. R is standing third to the left of Q who is near to T.
Statement I alone isn’t sufficient to answer the question.
Statement II:
Q isn’t the immediate neighbor of U who doesn’t sit any extreme ends of the row.
Statement II alone isn’t sufficient to answer the question.
Statement III:
T isn’t the immediate neighbor of P.
Statement III alone isn’t sufficient to answer the question.
On combining statements I and II:

Hence, statement I and II together is sufficient to answer the question.
On combining statements II and III:
Q isn’t the immediate neighbor of U who doesn’t sit any extreme ends of the row.
T isn’t the immediate neighbor of P.
Hence, statement II and III together isn’t sufficient to answer the question.
On combining statements I and III:
P is standing second from the left end. R is standing third to the left of Q who is near to T.
T isn’t the immediate neighbor of P.
Hence, statements I and III together isn’t sufficient to answer the question.
Hence, the data in statement I and statement II is sufficient to answer the question.