Match List I with List II and select the correct answer ...........

Indian Polity Judiciary

Match List I with List II and select the correct answer:

List I	List II
A.Keshavanand Bharti case	1. Theory of parliamentary sovereignty
B.The Golaknath case	2. Theory of basic structure of Indian Constitution
C. Bank Nationalization	3. Fundamental Rights cannot be amended
D. 25th amendment to Indian constitution	4. Compensation should be paid according to market value

Codes: A B C D

2 3 4 1

3 2 1 4

3 2 4 1

2 3 1 4

छोटे Courses बड़े Results

Master Judiciary

Prepare through Micro-courses

Try Now

Explanation:

1. The Kesavananda Bharathi judgement 1973 is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that outlined the Basic Structure doctrine of the Constitution. The Basic Structure doctrine forms the basis of power of the Indian judiciary to review, and strike down, amendments to the Constitution of India enacted by the Indian parliament which conflict with or seek to alter this basic structure of the Constitution.

2. In Golaknath v. State Of Punjab Indian Supreme Court case, the Court ruled that Parliament could not curtail any of the Fundamental Rights in the Constitution.

3.In 1970, the Supreme Court, in its judgement on Rustom Cavasjee Cooper v. Union Of India, popularly known as the Bank Nationalization case, held that the Constitution guarantees the right to compensation, that is, the equivalent money of the property compulsorily acquired.

4. Twenty fifth amendment, 1971 is related to theory of Parliamentary sovereignty.