send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
The allegations made by a former Supreme Court employee against the Chief Justice of India have brought the focus on the mechanism that exists to examine charges of misconduct against members of the higher judiciary.
An important question arises: what exactly is the procedure involved and how was it devised?
How are allegations of misconduct against judges of High Courts and the Supreme Court dealt with?
What is the origin of the ‘in-house’ procedure?
When was the in-house procedure adopted?
How does the in-house procedure work? What are the various steps?
What are the possible outcomes from the inquiry committee?
By: Priyank Kishore ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses