send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements regarding the lapsing of a bill on dissolution of the Lok Sabha:
1. A bill originated and passed in the Rajya Sabha but pending in the Lok Sabha does not lapse
2. A bill for which the President has notified the holding of a joint sitting before the dissolution of Lok Sabha, does not lapse
3. A bill passed by both Houses but returned by the president for reconsideration of Houses lapses
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
2 only
2 and 3 only
1 and 3 only
1, 2 and 3
Statement 1 is incorrect. A bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses (whether originating in the Lok Sabha or transmitted to it by the Rajya Sabha).
Statement 2 is correct. A bill not passed by the two Houses due to disagreement and if the president has notified the holding of a joint sitting before the dissolution of Lok Sabha, does not lapse.
Statement 3 is incorrect. A bill passed by both Houses but returned by the president for reconsideration of Houses does not lapse.
By: Vishal ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses