send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statement/s regarding Employment Elasticity of Growth:
1. It is the percentage change in employment of labour force in response to percentage change in population growth.
2. Additional labour force can be suitably employed only when employment elasticity of growth is high.
3. In India, employment elasticity has shown an increasing trend in the past decade.
Which of the above is/are correct?
2 only
1 and 3 only
1 and 2 only
2 and 3 only
Employment elasticity of growth is percentage change in employment of labour force in response to percentage change in economic growth i.e. ratio of growth rate of employment to growth rate of GDP. The importance of the concept of employment elasticity of growth lies in the fact that it determines the employment capabilities of an economy. Additional labour force can be suitably employed only when employment elasticity of growth is high .If the employment elasticity of growth is less, then some of the labour force remains employed. The employment elasticity in India in the last decadedeclined from 0.44 in the first half of the decade 1999-2000 to 2004-05, to as low as 0.01 during second halfof the decade 2004-05 to 2009-10.
By: Kritika Kaushal ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses