send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Context
India and Pakistan announced in November they would operationalise a corridor from Dera Baba Nanak in Punjab to Kartarpur Sahib Gurdwara in Pakistan’s Punjab.
Optimistic Background
It was hailed as a step forward in an otherwise fraught relationship.
Prime Minister appeared to share the optimism when he likened the initiative’s potential to the fall of the Berlin Wall.
Challenges in the formulation of the corridor
There has been round upon round of wrangling between the two governments over every detail like
The number of pilgrims to be accommodated,
The security restrictions.
The documentation and mode of transport to be used by pilgrims.
The base of the differences is the deep distrust between the two governments
A chasm that has deepened in the aftermath of the Pulwama attack and the Balakot strike.
Pakistan Prime Ministers administration feels it should be given more credit for having cleared the Kartarpur proposal
For its part, New Delhi refuses to acknowledge Pakistan’s overture, and has made it clear the corridor will have no connection with furthering bilateral talks on other issues.
Meanwhile, security agencies have voiced concerns about a possible attempt by Pakistan’s military establishment to use the corridor to fuel separatist Khalistani sentiment.
Khalsitan Concerns
The government’s decision now to postpone the next round of technical talks, which were scheduled for April 2, is driven mainly by those concerns.
In particular the inclusion of some known Khalistan activists in a gurdwara committee that would interact with pilgrims from India.
Last week, the Ministry of External Affairs summoned Pakistan’s Deputy High Commissioner and sought clarifications on the “controversial elements” on the committee, and said the next meeting would only be held after it receives Pakistan’s response.
Balancing security and corridor
While none of the government’s concerns is unwarranted, it could not have been unprepared when it embarked on the corridor proposal.
Pakistan’s support to separatist Sikh groups goes back several decades.
India must work to secure its border from the threat even as it opens the gates for thousands of pilgrims to travel to Pakistan.
National security must get priority.
But for this, there must be an effort by all stakeholders in India — the Centre, the State government and the leadership of the BJP, the Akalis and the Congress — to resist scoring political points against one another.
Way Forward
Modalities and technical issues, such as on the numbers, eligibility and identity proof required for the trip to Kartarpur Sahib, should be ironed out by both governments.
Putting off meetings is hardly a constructive solution, given the proposed opening by November to mark the 550th birth anniversary of Guru Nanak.
By: VISHAL GOYAL ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses