send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Context:
US President Mr. Trump’s tweet marked a reversal of decades of US policy, which has refused to condone the Israeli occupation of Golan, and urged that the dispute must be resolved diplomatically.
President Trump made new U.S. policy, with a tweet recognizing Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heightson the border with Syria.
The President has earlier recognised the disputed city of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, moved the American Embassy there from Tel Aviv, and stopped aid to Palestinian refugees.
Last year, the US voted against a ritual annual UN resolution condemning Israel’s continued seizure of the Golan Heights.
Because nothing is happening on Golan and nobody expects Israel to pull back in any case, Trump’s tweet does not change anything what it does, however, is extend legitimacy to Israel’s position.
Golan Heights: A Political and Strategic asset:
Present living Population in Golan Heights:
According to some estimates, there are around 50,000 people, with Israeli Jewish settlers making up nearly half.
The rest are mostly people of Syrian ancestry who are Druze, a religion that has been described as an offshoot of Ismaili Islam.
Druze residents of the Golan Heights have largely resisted obtaining Israeli citizenship and have maintained a strong connection to Syria for decades.
But overall, life in the Golan Heights has been relatively tranquil compared with other places on Israel’s frontiers.
Israeli and Syrian armies are separated by a 400 sq. km demilitarized zone, which neither side can enter and Israel argues that Golan Heights is a security buffer against the war in Syria.
What changed on recent Policy shift by US?
For decades, the United Nations and the United States refused to recognize Israel’s seizure of the Golan Heights and the West Bank in 1967, arguing that the contours of Israel must be negotiated diplomatically.
Mr. Trump mentioned that, after 52 years it is time for the United States to fully recognize Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights, which is of critical strategic and security importance to the State of Israel and Regional Stability.
Recognition of the Golan Heights could pave the way for US recognition of Israeli sovereignty in the Palestinian occupied territories.
In a recent state department report on human rights, the administration changed its description of the West Bank and Gaza from “occupied territories” to “Israeli-controlled territories”.
Conclusion:
Russian Foreign Ministry condemned the move, calling it a “direct violation of UN decisions.”
They highlighted that Changing the status of the Golan Heights bypassing the Security Council is in direct violation of UN decisions.
Some analysts pointed out that Mr. Trump’s gesture amounted to a form of compensation to Israel, since he has ordered American troops to withdraw from Syria leaving Israel more vulnerable to attacks.
The Syrian government said in a statement it is now more intent on liberating the Golan, “using every possible means.”
The announcement was the latest in a series of steps under the Trump administration that have reshaped the United States role in conflicts between Israel and its Arab neighbors, to the benefit of Israel’s right-wing government.
Former diplomats said Mr. Trump’s action was unnecessary and would inflame an issue that had been largely dormant.
They also said it would embolden other world leaders who seized territory in violation of international norms.
By: Priyank Kishore ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses