send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Context
Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) approved Rs 8,580 crore for solar power projectsdeveloped under the second phase of the Central Public Sector Undertaking (CPSU) scheme. This is expected to add 12 gigawatt (GW) capacity to the power grid between 2019-20 and 2022-23.
With this move, the long-standing ‘import versus manufacturing’ debate that has dogged India’s solar sector has resurfaced
About
CCEA has recently approved an extension to the existing 1,000 megawatts (MW) central public sector undertaking (CPSU) scheme under the National Solar Mission (NSM), taking the cumulative capacity approved under it to 12 gigawatt (GW).
The new funds allocated for the CPSU scheme, is a welcome relief for existing manufacturers, given the slowdown that has hit the sector.
Background
The domestic photovoltaic (PV) manufacturing sector has struggled to capitalize on the solar boom — 88 per cent of solar modules are still imported, with China supplying the lion’s share.
Buoyed by oversupply at home along with state support, Chinese manufacturers are able to supply solar panels significantly cheaper, contributing to falling solar power tariffs in India’s competitive reverse bidding auctions.
After the Indian Solar Manufacturers Association (ISMA) sought an anti-dumping duty on modules from China, Malaysia and Taiwan, a safeguard duty of 25 per cent was levied. It is to be progressively lowered to 15 per cent over two years.
There is another trouble brewing over the Domestic Content Requirement (DCR). DCR lays down that a certain percentage of modules will have to be made in India — in the National Solar Mission and state auctions.
DCR ran into trouble with World Trade Organization (WTO) regulations, and was scrapped in 2017.
Types of technology utilized in the solar panels
Monocrystalline:
Polycrystalline:
Thin Film:
Other related terms
Photovoltaic:
Viability gap funding:
Safeguard duty:
The duty, typically imposed during import surges, is meant to protect domestic manufacturers.
Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission/National Solar Mission (NSM):
Reasons for introducing short-term measures to enable Solar plan:
Key hurdles:
Structural deficiency factors:
Structural support required as outlined by the Ministry of Renewable Energy:
Way forward
Facilitating enabling factors as outlined by the Ministry of renewable energy would help in improving the competitiveness of domestic manufacturers compared with global giants, which have large installed manufacturing bases, a presence across the value chain and are more cost-efficient.
This has to be complemented by quicker policy actions and heavy investment at research and development stage.
By: Priyank Kishore ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses