send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which among the following is not the reason that Himalayas have no volcanoes?
The subduction zone of Indian – Eurasian plate lie under Tibetan Plateau.
Volcanoes are not found in areas where the plates are convergent in nature.
The batholiths under Himalayas is way older in age than the event of plate collision between Indian and Eurasian plate.
Continental collisions generally don’t give rise to Vulcanism as there is absence of volcanic arc due to absence of water.
The Himalayas formed due to Continental collision between the Indian Plate and Eurasian Plate. The mountains themselves are actually a wedge of rock belonging to the Indian plate that are being 'bulldozed' by the Eurasian plate. Thus, the earthquakes in the Himalayas have nothing to do with volcanoes , rather they are to do with the collision between the two plates. The subduction zone for the Indian-Eurasian plate collision is located under the Tibetan Plateau. Hence, the answer is B.
By: Kritika Kaushal ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses