send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements with reference to the Jagir System.
1. Jagir was a unit of land assigned in lieu of salary.
2. Assignment of Jagir conferred hereditary rights of that Jagir to the Mansabdar.
3. All the Mansabdars were paid salary in Kind by granting of Jagirs.
Which of the above statements is/are incorrect?
1&3 only
2&3 only
1&2 only
None of the above
Jagirdari system was a part of the Umbrella Mansabdari System. Jagir or Tuyul was the Unit of land given to the soldiers in lieu of salary, the revenue from the Jagir was to be the salary for the mansabdar and the soldiers. The land given in lieu for military service was called Tankhwa jagir and the hereditary land given to mansabdars was called Watan Jagir, they were not hereditary in the sense that the revenues could be used only as long as they remained in service, the emperor could re-assign the Jagirs to anyone at any time. All Jagirdars were mansabdars, but all mansabdars were not Jagirdars as some of them were paid in cash.
By: Shubham Tiwari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses