send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements regarding ‘Quo-Warranto’:
1. It prevents illegal usurpation of public office by a person.
2. It cannot be issued in case of Ministerial office or private office.
3. This can be sought by any interested person and not necessarily by the aggrieved person.
Which of the above statements are correct?
1&2 only
1&3 only
2&3 only
All the above
The writ lies only in respect of a public office of a substantial character. The motive of appointing an officer in making the appointment in question is irrelevant in a Quo Warranto petition. This writ cannot be issued against the appointment of a council of ministers, chief ministers, and governors. neither can it question the authority of private institutions to hold an office of a private character.
By: Shubham Tiwari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses