send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
A person to be appointed as a judge of a high court, should have the following qualifications:
1. He should have been an advocate of a high court (or high courts in succession) for ten years.
2. He should have held a judicial office in the territory of India for ten years.
3. A distinguished jurist in the opinion of President.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
1&2 only
2&3 only
1,2&3 only
None
Qualifications of Judges:A person to be appointed as a judge of a high court, should have the following qualifications:
From the above, it is clear that the Constitution has not prescribed a minimum age for appointment as a judge of a high court. Moreover, unlike in the case of the Supreme Court, the Constitution makes no provision for appointment of a distinguished jurist as a judge of a high court.
By: Shubham Tiwari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses