send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Your free trial has ended. Purchase this micro course to continue learning.
8 of 24 completed
5 of 15 completed
38 of 100 completed
8 of 20 completed
Indian Economy - Understanding the basics of Indian economic system
Consider the following statements about Operation Polo
It was a police action against the Razakars, a militant group that supported the Nizam’s independence.
It resulted in the integration of Hyderabad into the Indian Union and the abolition of the Nizam’s rule.
It was opposed by the United Nations, which passed a resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire and a plebiscite in Hyderabad.
It was preceded by a standstill agreement between India and Hyderabad, which maintained the status quo of their relations.
How many of the following statements is/are correct?
Only One
Only Two
Only Three
All Four
Only statements 1,2&4 are correct.
The Razakars were a paramilitary force that advocated for the Nizam’s sovereignty and resisted the Indian invasion. They were accused of committing atrocities against the Hindu population and the Telangana rebels, who wanted land reforms and democracy.
Operation Polo ended with the surrender of the Nizam on September 18, 1948. He signed an instrument of accession, joining India as a princely state. He was later appointed as the Rajpramukh (governor) of Hyderabad until 1956, when the state was reorganized along linguistic lines.
The United Nations did not intervene in the conflict, as it was considered an internal matter of India. However, Pakistan protested against India’s action and accused it of violating international law and human rights.
In November 1947, Hyderabad signed a standstill agreement with India, which continued all previous arrangements except for the stationing of Indian troops in the state. The agreement was meant to last for one year, during which a final settlement would be reached. However, India accused Hyderabad of violating the agreement by importing arms, seeking foreign recognition, and supporting subversive activities.
Hence option 3rd is correct.
By: Shubham Tiwari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses