send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
With reference to president's rule in India ,which of the following statement is correct?
1.imposition of presidents rule is completely immune from judicial review
2.president can proclaim failure of constitutional machinery in a state on the basis of governor report only
3.president can extend duration of proclamation beyond normal one year period on the basis of report of the governor
4.The president cannot take over to himself the power that are vested in the high court of the state.
1 and 2 only
2 and 4 only
3 and 4 only
4only
When president rule is imposed at that time president may take over executive and legislature function .but cannot have the power to assume the function of high court .all other statement are incorrect .president may issue proclamation of emergency on the basis of report of governor of the state or otherwise can be subject to judicial review and judiciary can check whether 356 art is missed or not .
By: Anjana agarwal ProfileResourcesReport error
Dnyanesh
2nd option is also right na??
read question and explanation again
Access to prime resources
New Courses