send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements with respect to advisory jurisdiction of Supreme Court:
1.When President of India refers any matter of public importance to Supreme Court for advice, Supreme Court is not bound to give advice on such matters
2.When Supreme Court gave advice, President is bound to accept such an advice
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
·In advisory jurisdiction Supreme Court is not bound to give advice on such matters and president is not bound to accept such an advice ·This utility is two – fold. In the first, it allows the government to seek legal opinion on a matter of importance before taking action on it. This may prevent unnecessary litigations later. Secondly, in the light of the advice of the Supreme Court, the government can make suitable changes in its action or legislations.
By: Anupama Sharma ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses