Explanation:

Fourth option is correct.

The Supreme Court Ruled that right of a woman to pray is her constitutional right and it is against the constitutional mandate to deny entry to women in any temple.

In its first preliminary observations on a rule barring women from entering the Sabarimala temple in Kerala due to biological reasons, the Supreme Court has said women have the constitutional right of equal access to public places of worship to pray. Any rule that stood in their way would be against this right, the apex court said.
Observations made by the Court-

•     In a public place of worship, a woman can enter, where a man can go. What applies to a man, applies to a woman.
•     Women and their physiological phenomena are creations of God. If not God, of nature. Why should this (menstruation) be a reason for exclusion for employment or worship or anything?
•     Article 25 (1) mandates freedom of conscience and right to practise religion. “All persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion”. This means right to pray is a constitutional right.
•     Also, the Constitution upholds the ideals of liberty of thought, expression, belief and faith, be it for man or woman.

Therefore, the discrimination is a violation of the rights to equality and gender justice.