send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
With reference to the nature of peasant movements after 1857, consider the following statements:
1.Peasant struggles were directed towards specific objectives and not colonialism.
2.There was growing involvement of the educated middle-class intelligentsia as spokespersons for the aggrieved peasantry.
3. The territorial reach of the peasant movements was limited.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 and 2 Only
2 and 3 Only
1 and 3 Only
1,2 & 3
There was a certain shift in the nature of peasant movements after 1857. Princes, chiefs and landlords having been crushed or co-opted, peasants emerged as the main force in agrarian movements. They now fought directly for their own demands, centered almost wholly on economic issues, and against their immediate enemies, foreign planters and indigenous zamindaris and moneylenders.Their struggles were directed towards specific and limited objectives and redressal of particular grievances. They did not make colonialism their target. Nor was their objective the ending of the system of their subordination and exploitation. The territorial reach of these movements was also limited. They were confined to particular localities with no mutual communication or linkages.
The other important feature was the growing involvement of the educated middle-class intelligentsia as spokespersons for the aggrieved peasantry,thus adding new dimensions to their protests.
By: Harman Sandhu ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses