send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements:
1. The writ jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is wider than that of the High Court
2. Only supreme court is empowered to entertain constitutional cases
Which among the above statements is / are correct?
1 Only
2 Only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
The first statement is written reverse and is incorrect. Supreme Court can issue writs only for the enforcement of the Fundamental Rights and not for other purposes. The high court can issue writs not only for the enforcement of the fundamental rights but also for other purposes. This implies that the writ jurisdiction of the high court is wider than that of the Supreme Court. However, supreme court can be empowered by the parliament to issue writs for other purposes. The second statement is also incorrect.
By: Harman Sandhu ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses