send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
With reference to 'Right to the Constitutional Remedies', which of the following statements is correct?
1. An aggrieved person can approach the Supreme Court under ‘Right to Constitutional Remedies’ if any of the Constitutional Rights are violated.
2. 'Right to the Constitutional Remedies' cannot be amended by the Parliament.
1 only
2 only
both 1&2
neither 1&2
Statement 1 is incorrect : 'Right to Constitutional Remedies' is available only against violation of Fundamental Rights.
Statement 2 is correct: As per the Supreme Court of India, 'Right to Constitutional Remedies' under Article 32 is a part of the basic structure of the constitution and thus cannot be amended.
By: Sarth Gupta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses