Consider the following Statements regarding National Judicial Infrastructure Authority of India NJIA...........

Indian Polity Judiciary

Download Solution PDF

Consider the following Statements regarding National Judicial Infrastructure Authority of India (NJIAI)

It works as a central agency with each State having its own State Judicial Infrastructure Authority, much like the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) model.
It will take control of the budgeting and infrastructure development of subordinate courts in the country.
Like NALSA, the NJIAI placed under the Supreme Court of India.

Select the correct statement.

1&2 only

2&3 only

1&3 only

All of the above

छोटे Courses बड़े Results

Master Judiciary

Prepare through Micro-courses

Try Now

Explanation:

Statement 1 is correct: The proposed NJIAI could work as a central agency with each State having its own State Judicial Infrastructure Authority, much like the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) model.

NALSA was constituted to establish a nationwide uniform network for providing free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society.

Statement 2 is correct: NJIAI will take control of the budgeting and infrastructure development of subordinate courts in the country.
Statement 3 is incorrect: The proposed NJIAI should be placed under the Supreme Court of India unlike NALSA which is serviced by the Ministry of Law and Justice.

It will not suggest any major policy change but will give complete freedom to HCs to come up with projects to strengthen ground-level courts.

Members

In the NJIAI there could be a few High Court judges as members, and some central government officials because the centre must also know where the funds are being utilised.
Similarly, in the State Judicial Infrastructure Authority, in addition to the Chief Justice of the respective High Court and a nominated judge, four to five district court judges and state government officials could be members.

Need of NJIAI
To Manage the Funds

Of a total of Rs. 981.98 crore sanctioned in 2019-20 under the Centrally Sponsored Scheme (CSS) to the States and Union Territories for development of infrastructure in the courts, only Rs. 84.9 crore was utilised by a combined five States, rendering the remaining 91.36% funds unused.
The issue has been plaguing the Indian judiciary for nearly three decades when the CSS was introduced in 1993-94.

Manage Rising Number of Litigations

The Indian judiciary’s infrastructure has not kept pace with the sheer number of litigations instituted every year.
A point cemented by the fact that the total sanctioned strength of judicial officers in the country is 24,280, but the number of court halls available is just 20,143, including 620 rented halls.

Greater Autonomy

The improvement and maintenance of judicial infrastructure is still being carried out in an ad-hoc and unplanned manner.
The need for “financial autonomy of the judiciary” and creation of the NJIAI that will work as a central agency with a degree of autonomy.

Hence option 1st is correct.