send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements related to the abrogation or restriction of fundamental rights:
1. The application of fundamental rights to the members of armed forces and analogous services can be restricted or abrogated by the President.
2. The application of fundamental rights can be restricted while martial law is in force in any area .
Which of the above given statements is/are correct?
1 only
2 only
Both are correct
Neither are correct
First statement is incorrect. Article 33 & 34 empower the Parliament to restrict, modify or abrogate the fundamental rights to the members of armed forces, para-military forces, police forces, members of intelligence agencies or similar services. Article 34 pertains to the restrictions on the fundamental rights conferred by this part while martial law is in force in any area.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses