send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements about adjudication of inter-state water disputes:
1. Constitution under Article 262, says that, Parliament may by law provide for the adjudication of any such dispute or complaint.
2. Parliament may also provide that neither the Supreme Court nor any other court is to exercise jurisdiction in respect of any such dispute or complaint.
3. The decision of the tribunal setup under the Inter-State Water Disputes Act is final and binding on the parties to the dispute.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
1 and 2 only
2 and 3 only
1 and 3 only
All of the above
All the statements are correct.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses