send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
According to the Economic Survey 2016-17, the Fiscal Responsibility Legislations (FRLs) adopted by the states were alone not responsible for the deficit reduction, other exogenous factors were also equally important. What are those exogenous factors according to the survey?
1) Acceleration of GDP growth thereby boosting states' revenue
2) Increased transfers from the centre to the states
3) Reduced interest payments of states on account of debt restructuring package offered by centre
4) Reduced need for spending by the states owing to many centrally sponsored schemes being run by the centre
codes:
1 and 2 only
3 and 4 only
1,3 and 4 only
All of the above
From the survey: Just because fiscal progress followed the introduction of the FRL doesn’t mean the FRLs were responsible for this progress. To begin with, the deficit reduction owes much to favorable exogenous factors: • An acceleration of nominal GDP growth (of 6 percentage points on average) helped boost states’ revenues by about 1 percent of GSDP; • Increased transfers from the centre of about 1 percent of GSDP both because of the 13th Finance Commission recommendations and the surge in central government revenues; • Reduced interest payments of about 0.9 percent of GSDP on account of the debt restructuring package offered by the centre; and • Reduced need for spending by the states—estimated at about 1.2 percent of GDP—as the centre took on a number of major social sector expenditures under the Centrally Sponsored Schemed (CSS)
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses