send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In which of the following cases was the principle of “Basic Structure Doctrine” used by the Supreme Court to strike down the provisions of Constitutional Amendment Acts?
1) KesavanandaBharativs State of Kerala.
2) Minerva Mills vs Union of India
3) Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and another vs Union of India, 2015
4) Golaknathvs State of Punjab
Code
1 only
1, 2 and 3
2 and 3
1, 2, 3 and 4
The Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that outlined the Basic Structure doctrine of the Constitution. Minerva Mills Ltd. vs. Union of India is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that applied and evolved the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution of India. Supreme Court advocates on Record Association and Others vs. Union of India judgement is based on independence of Judiciary as part of basic structure of the Constitution along with the third Judge's case firmly established the collegiums system in India for the nomination of Judges to the Supreme Court and High Court. Golaknath vs. State Of Punjab (1967) was an Indian Supreme Court case, in which the Court ruled that Parliament could not curtail any of the Fundamental Rights in the Constitution. So it does not deal with basic structure of Constitution of India.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Shweta Maini
Acc to explanation option 3 is also correct. I plz clarify
Access to prime resources
New Courses