send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Choose the correct statement
In India “due process” replaced “procedure established by law” in Maneka Case by interpreting Article 21.
42nd Constitutional Amendment sought to tilt the balance between parliamentary supremacy and judicial review towards the latter.
Minerva Mills case led to supremacy of Directive Principles of State Policy over Fundamental Rights.
“The bold experiment” taken up by Indian Constitution makers was providing fundamental rights to minorities.
2nd statement is incorrect because 24 amendment sought to tilt the balance between parliamentary supremacy and judicial review towards the latter. 3rd statement is incorrect. In the Minerva Mills case, the Supreme Court provided key clarifications on the interpretation of the basic structure doctrine. The court unanimously ruled that the power of the Parliament of India to amend the constitution is limited by the constitution.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses