Context: Recently, Attorney General KK Venugopal has said the lack of woman lawyers and gender sensitisation is a reason behind irresponsible bail orders.
Key Points

• Pointing out that there has never been a woman chief justice, he told the Supreme Court that more women judges in constitutional courts would certainly improve gender sensitivity in the judiciary.
• He opined that improving the representation of women could also go a long way towards a more balanced and empathetic approach in cases involving sexual violence.

Gender disparity in judiciary: The Supreme court has only two women judges as against a sanctioned strength of 34 judges. There has never been a female Chief Justice. 

• There are only 80 women judges out of the sanctioned strength of 1,113 judges in the High Courts and the Supreme Court.
• They comprise only 7.2% of the number of judges. 
• There are six High Courts — Manipur, Meghalaya, Patna, Tripura, Telangana, and Uttarakhand, having no sitting woman judge.
• In the senior designation of lawyers, there are only 17 women senior counsel designates in the SC as opposed to 403 men.
• The Delhi HC has 8 women and 229 men designates. Similarly, in the Bombay HC, there are 6 women and 157 men designates.

Gender sensitivity and judiciary

• There is dearth of compulsory courses in gender sensitisation in law schools.
• The All India Bar Examination does not contain even a single question or section relating to gender sensitisation. 
• The Bar Council of India may take necessary steps in this regard.

Importance of Women in Judiciary

• The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, and Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 5 and SDG 16 in particular), address the global responsibility of having gender equality and women’s representation in public institutions such as the judiciary.
• Achieving equality for women judges is important not only because it is a right for women, but also because it is right for the achievement of a more just rule of law. Women judges strengthen the judiciary and help to gain the public's trust.
• The entry of women judges is a positive step in the direction of judiciaries being perceived as being more transparent, inclusive, and representative of the people whose lives they affect.
• Women judges enhance the legitimacy of courts, sending a powerful signal that they are open and accessible to those who seek recourse to justice.
• Women judges bring those lived experiences to their judicial actions, experiences that tend toward a more comprehensive and empathetic perspective.
• Adjudication is enhanced by the presence of women who bring to the fore considerations that would not have been taken into account in their absence and the scope of the discussion is hence enlarged, possibly preventing ill-considered or improper decisions.
• By elucidating how laws and rulings can be based on gender stereotypes, or how they might have a different impact on women and men, a gender perspective enhances the fairness of adjudication, which ultimately benefits both men and women.

Suggestions

• Courts should declare that such remarks (MP HC issue) are unacceptable which can potentially cause harm to the victim and to society at large.
• Judicial orders should conform to certain judicial standards and necessary steps have to be taken to ensure that this does not happen in the future.
• The SC must direct the collection of data to determine the number of women judges in the lower judiciary and tribunals and also to determine the year-wise number of senior designates by all HCs.
• Greater representation of women should be ensured at all levels of the judiciary, including the SC and this initiative must come from the SC itself, considering that the power of appointment rests almost exclusively with the SC Collegium.
• The judges of the SC are appointed by the President. The CJI is appointed by the President after consultation with such judges of the SC and HCs as (s)he deems necessary.
• The other judges are appointed by the President after consultation with the CJI and such other judges of the SC and the HCs as (s)he deems necessary. The consultation with the CJI is obligatory in the case of appointment of a judge other than CJI.
• The goal must be to achieve at least 50% representation of women in all leadership positions and there should be a mandatory training of all lawyers on gender sensitisation.
• Judges, who might belong to the “old school” and are maybe “patriarchal” in outlook, should be sensitised to deal with cases of sexual violence so that they do not pass orders objectifying women in such cases.

Road Ahead

• The wide prevalence of orders like the one from the MP HC and other similar instances makes it clear that there is a need for urgent intervention from the Courts. Improving the representation of women in the judiciary is of crucial importance and have to go a long way towards a more balanced and empathetic approach in cases involving sexual violence.
• Changing the long-established demographics of a court can make the institution more amenable to consider itself in a new light, and potentially lead to further modernisation and reform. As a court's composition becomes more diverse, its customary practices become less entrenched; consequently, the old methods, often based on unstated codes of behavior, or simply inertia, are no longer adequate.